SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 407

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Ameena Bi (deceased) and others – Appellant
Versus
Ameer Bi and others – Respondent


Advocates:
P. Veeraraghavan, for Appellants. V.RGopalan, for Respondents.

Judgment :

Plaintiff in O.S.No.1459 of 1977, on the file of City Civil Court, Madras, filed the above second appeal. She died later, and appellants 2 and 3 and 6th respondent have been impleaded as her legal representatives.

2. Suit filed by plaintiff was one for permanent injunction on the following allegations: Plaintiff purchased the property mentioned in the plaint, on 19. 1974 as per Ex.A-1 and was in exclusive possession of the property. She is the second wife of one Sattar Khan. Before her marriage with Sattar Khan, her elder sister Zainub Bi was his wife. On the death of Zainub Bi, plaintiff married Sattar khan. It is further said that in the earlier marriage, Sattar Khan had a daughter, and she was given in marriage to one Sulaiman, and Sulaiman and his wife were residing in the suit property. It is said that Sulaiman’s wife died, and afterwards Sulaiman is keeping first defendant as his mistress. Sulaiman, along with the first defendant, taking advantage of their occupation, have leased out portions of the suit property to second defendant, who has sub-leased the same to defendants 3 to 5. It is said that first defendant is also claiming title to the suit property. There







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top