S.S.SUBRAMANI
S. V. Periasamy & Sons by its Partner S. V. Periasamy Nadar and others – Appellant
Versus
R. Senthil Kumar and others – Respondent
Tenants in R.C.O.P.No.71 of 1987, on the file of Rent Controller (District Munsif’s Court), Tuticorin, are the revision petitioners. First respondent herein filed the above eviction petition on the ground that the tenants have defaulted in payment of rent and the said default is wilful. It is also alleged that the building requires demolition and reconstruction. Eviction was also sought on various other grounds including acts of waste, acts of nuisance, claiming permanent tenancy without any bona fides etc. The last three grounds referred to above were found against the landlord even by Rent Controller, and the matter was not agitated before the Appellate Authority also on those grounds. The only ground for eviction which found favour with the Rent Controller was that the revision petitioners have committed wilful default and that the building requires demolition and reconstruction. The finding was also confirmed by the Appellate Authority. It is that judgment, which is sought to be revised by the revision petitioners.
2. If this is the only ground that is agitated before this Court, being a finding of fact, it will not be proper on the part of this Court to interfere wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.