K.A.SWAMI, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Indian Bank represented by its Chairman, and Managing Director, Madras and another – Appellant
Versus
P. S. Evalappan – Respondent
AR. Lakshmanan, J.
The writ appeal is directed against the order of K.Venkataswami, J. as he then was, dated 212. 1987 in W.P.No.l 1336 of 1981 allowing the said writ petition filed by the respondent herein holding that the order impugned in the writ petition was passed by an authority not competent under the new Regulations and also rejecting the argument of the learned counsel for the Indian Bank that the order was passed by an authority higher than the competent authority since the respondent herein is deprived of an appeal to the Appellate Authority. The learned Judge quashed the order impunged in the writ petition on both these grounds. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge in the writ petition, the Indian Bank has preferred the above writ appeal.
2. The respondent was appointed as an Assistant in the Indian Bank. He was promoted as an Accountant in the year 1966 in which position he served until 1968. He was then promoted as Agent and posted to the Coonoor branch during 1968, which position he held till 18. 1970, when he was suspended pending disciplinary proceedings, which culminated in the order of dismissal by proceedings dated 210. 1972. At.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.