SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Mad) 584

A.R.LAKSHMANAN
A. M. A. Jabbar – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Abdul Bari and others – Respondent


Advocates:
Mrs.Nalini Chidambaram, Senior Counsel, for N. Thiagarajan, for Petitioner. V.Manohar, for Respondents.

Judgment :

The tenant is the review petitioner. The landlord T.M. Sulaiman filed a petition under Secs.l0(2)(i) and 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, for eviction of the tenant in R.C.O.P. No.253 of 1985 on the file of the Rent Controller/ District Munsif, Coimbatore, on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and for additional accommodation. The eviction petition was resisted by the tenant contending that he had not committed any default in payment of rent and that the requirement of the landlord for additional accommodation is not bona fide. The learned Rent Controller dismissed the petition against which the legal representatives of the landlord T.M. Sulaiman, the respondent herein, filed R.C.A. No.67 of 1989 on the file of the Appellate Authority/ Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. The learned Appellate Authority has confirmed the findings of the learned Rent Controller insofar as it relates to the requirement of the premises for additional accommodation but ordered eviction on the ground of wilful default . in payment of rent. The civil revision petition was filed by the tenant against the finding of the learned Appellate Authority.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top