A.R.LAKSHMANAN
A. M. A. Jabbar – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Abdul Bari and others – Respondent
The tenant is the review petitioner. The landlord T.M. Sulaiman filed a petition under Secs.l0(2)(i) and 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, for eviction of the tenant in R.C.O.P. No.253 of 1985 on the file of the Rent Controller/ District Munsif, Coimbatore, on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and for additional accommodation. The eviction petition was resisted by the tenant contending that he had not committed any default in payment of rent and that the requirement of the landlord for additional accommodation is not bona fide. The learned Rent Controller dismissed the petition against which the legal representatives of the landlord T.M. Sulaiman, the respondent herein, filed R.C.A. No.67 of 1989 on the file of the Appellate Authority/ Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. The learned Appellate Authority has confirmed the findings of the learned Rent Controller insofar as it relates to the requirement of the premises for additional accommodation but ordered eviction on the ground of wilful default . in payment of rent. The civil revision petition was filed by the tenant against the finding of the learned Appellate Authority.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.