1. Aggrieved against the order of the first respondent dated 27. 1995 dismissing the petitioner from service, he has filed the present writ petition for quashing the same and consequential direction for re-instatement with all backwages and other benefits.

.2. The case of the petitioner as seen from the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition is briefly stated hereunder:-

Since the first respondent school being a minority institution, the provisions relating to approval, appeal and other provisions of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 are not applicable as per the Division Bench judgment of this Court, dated 24. 1976, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Art.226 of the Constitution of India. It is contended that the entire charges from charge No. 1 to 10 which is found in the impugned order of dismissal would reveal that they are for the alleged complaint against the wrong administration of the first respondent school which is said to have been sent by one V. Palanisamy, who is nothing to do with the petitioner herein. The impugned order of dismissal is liable to be dismissed on the sole ground that the first res