KANAKARAJ
Narayana Rajoo and Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu and Another – Respondent
The petitioners purchased different parcels of land in Silayaneri village, Madurai Taluk for construction of residential houses for them. Only when the petitioners were served with notice under Secs.9(3) and 10 of the Land Acquisition Act, they became aware of the Land Acquisition proceedings in respect of their lands. The award enquiry was conducted on 16. 1982 and the petitioners submitted their objections. It is the case of the petitioners that they had not been served with notices for the enquiry under Sec.5-A of the Act. On enquiry, the petitioners came to know that the notification under Sec.4(l) of the Act was published in the Gazette on 25. 1977 and declaration under Sec.6 was published on 25. 1980. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents to proceed with the acquisition of their lands under Sec.4(l) and the Declaration under Sec.6.
2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. It is stated that the Notification under Sec4(l) was published in the Gazette on 25. 1977. The names of the petitioners did not find a place in the notification because their names were not shown in the Revenue Records. Theenquiry un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.