SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 207

BELLIE
S. Govindasamy Naidu and others – Appellant
Versus
Poorna Valli and others – Respondent


Advocates:
T.L.Ram Mohan, for Appellants. K.Vaitheeswaran, for Respondents.

Judgment :

The suit which was filed for declaration, injunction and possession was dismissed by the trial court but the first appellate court has decreed the suit for declaration but dismissed it regarding permanent injunction and possession. This second appeal is filed by the defendants. The plaintiffs have filed the cross objection.

2. The suit has been filed by the plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and as representatives of “Thousand Yadhavas Community”, Madurai, on the following allegations:

Sri Ramaswamy temple and Sri Navaneethakrish-naswamy temple which are in North Masi Street, Madurai town are under the management of the Devasthanam of “Thousand Yadhavas”

These temples belong to the community of Thousand Yadhavas’ who are mainly residents of Madurai Town and other places in Madurai District Thousand Yadhavas’ community forms a considerable section of the Hindu community. The temples are old ones and members of the public take part in its festivals. These temples are public temples. The plaintiffs are members of the Thousand Yadhavas’ community and worshippers of the deities in these temples.

The first plaintiff is the wife of one Krishna Konar, son of Palaniandi Konar. He
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top