SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 681

THANGAMANI
Rajam Abraham – Appellant
Versus
Shantha – Respondent


Advocates:
V.Radhakrishnan, for Petitioner. P.L.Narayanan, for Respondent.

Judgment :

The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.95 of 1992 in the Court of District Munsif of Kodaikanal. He filed the suit for pertnanent injunction restraining the respondent/defendant from interfering with his possession of the suit property which is a House and vacant site on the northern side of old Survey No.99/R2-C3 in Lake Road, Kodaikanal Town. He claimed in the plaint that he has purchased this property under a sale deed-dated 24. 1992 from the power agent of the owner Yasumithiran. According to him, the suit was laid since the defendant sought to disturb his possession. Plaintiff also obtained an ex parte injunction in I.A.No.153 of 1992. Thereafter, the defendant came forward with I.A.No.167 of 1992 for the purpose of appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner to inspect the suit property, measure the same with the help of qualified Taluk Surveyor and to find out whether the building is situated in Survey No.99/B-2-C3 alone or in both Survey Nos.99/B2-C3 and 99/B2-C and to note the physical features and file his report with plan. Since the learned District Munsif has allowed the application and ordered appointment of a Commissioner, the plaintiff has come forw





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top