SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Mad) 833

SRINIVASAN, ABDUL HADI
Samou Jean Pierre – Appellant
Versus
Jacquline Samou – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Kumaraswamy, for Respondent.

Judgment :-

C.M.A.No.1192 of 1993: This is an appeal filed by the respondent in F.C.O.P.No.757 of 1991 on the file of Family Court, Madras, against an order made on 28. 1993 by the Principal Judge. The original petition was filed by the respondent herein for restitution of conjugal rights. It is not necessary to set out the allegations made in the original petition for the purpose of this appeal. The appellant is contesting the said petition, after filing a counter statement. The respondent filed I.A.No.578 of 1992 for grant of interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,500 p.m. till the disposal of the main original petition and also for Rs.3,000 by way of legal expenses to conduct the original petition. The appellant filed a counter affidavit in that petition. When that petition was pending, the respondent filed a memo on 33. 1993. According to the memo, no documentary proof was available to the respondent to prove the properties owned by the appellant. A request is made in the memo to treat the interlocutory application as main original petition and dispose of the same, without proof of documentary evidence. Another memo was filed on 3. 1993, by the respondent, in which some detail


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top