SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 399

THANGAMANI
V. Somu Gounder – Appellant
Versus
S. Natesa Gounder – Respondent


Advocates:
A.llango, for Petitioner. T.Ananthi, for Respondent.

Judgment :

This revision petition is directed against the order of learned District Munsif, Thiruthuraipoondi in I.A.No.626 of 1993 in O.S.No.93 of 1988 on his file. The respondent/ plaintiff instituted that suit for declaration and possession in respect of the property measuring 11 cents on the western part of his land include Survey No.97/1, New Survey No.897/7 of Thethakudi village. During the pendency of the suit he came forward with an application in I.A.No.1360 of 1990 under O.26, Rule 9, C.P.C. for the appointment of a Commissioner to inspect the suit property, note the physical features and submit his report. It appears that the Commissioner has accordingly executed the warrant and submitted his report on 30.12.1991. Thereafter he filed I.A.No.626 of 1993 another application under 0.26, Rule 9, C.P.C. for the very same purpose. This was resisted by the defendant for the reason that that petition without setting aside the earlier report of the Commissioner is not maintainable and that there was no infirmity in the report of the earlier Commissioner. The court below in the impugned order has allowed the application by merely stating that the appointment of a second Commissione





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top