SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 745

SHIVARAJ PATIL
A. Karunanidhi – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary and Correspondent, Poompuhar College, Melaiyur – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Chandru, for Petitioner. P.M. Bhaskaran, for Respondent.

Judgment :

The petitioner in this writ petition has sought for a writ in the nature of certiorarified mandamus after calling for the concerned records from the file of the respondent pertaining to the proceedings in reference Na.Ka.No.65/B1/94, quash the order dated 26. 1994 and consequently direct the respondent to continue the petitioner in service till 35. 1995.

2. The facts briefly stated leading to this writ petition are the following:

The petitioner was denied the right of re-employment till the end of the academic year, i.e. 35. 1995 contrary to the provisions of law. Poompuhar College, Melaiyur, Negai Quaide Millet District is a private college within the meaning of Sec.2(8) of Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 (in short refer to ‘the Act’). The said college is run by Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (H.R. & C.E.). As per Sec.11 of the Act, the administration of the college vests with the College Committee. The said committee consists of the Principal, two senior lecturers, a representative from the Bharathidasan University to which the said college is affiliated. There are three nominees of H.R. & C.E. Department.

3. The petitioner joine

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top