SRINIVASAN, S.S.SUBRAMANI
R. Vaidyalingam (since deceased) and others – Appellant
Versus
Madras Secretariat Cooperative House Building Society Limited and another – Respondent
Srinivasan, J.
In these matters when they were called in the morning session at about 01.10 p.m. a representation was made on behalf of Mr.R.Subra-maniam counsel for the appellants in Transfer Appeal Suit No.1005 of 1994 that he was engaged in some other court and he would like the case to be taken at 2.15 p.m. Mr.M.Renka appearing for the second respondent in the appeal, said that he would argue the review applications filed by him which are before us as Review Application Nos.21 and 107 of 1994. He started arguing review applications. We heard him in part. We adjourned for the lunch recess and when he assembled at 2.15 p.m. after the recess, Mr.Renka was absent. No representation was made on his behalf. Mr.R.Subramaniam, counsel for the appellants in Transfer Appeal No.1005 of 1994 was present in court and we passed over the review applications to take up the transfer appeal for hearing. There are three civil miscellaneous petitions namely 14941 to 14943 of 1994 for setting aside the abatement caused by the death of the sole appellant in Transfer Appeal No.1005 of 1994, to bring on record the petitioners as legal representatives of the deceased appellant and to appoint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.