SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 928

N.ARUMUGHAM
R. Kempammal – Appellant
Versus
K. Aravindakshan – Respondent


Advocates:
Usha, for B.Ramamoorthy. for Petitioner. A.K. IIango. for Respondent.

Judgment :

This revision filed under Sec.25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act of 1960 as amended up to date is being canvassed against the legality, propriety and correctness of the fair and final order passed by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority made in R.C.A.No.90 of 1985 dated 20th December, 1988 confirming in toto the fair and final order passed by the learned Rent Controller made in R.C.O.P.No.103 of 1984 on 3rd July, 1985.

2. Brief facts as culled out from the case records, which led to the revision may be extracted as hereunder:

The residential premises situated in the town of Ootacamund in Nilgiris District was under the tenancy occupation on a monthly rental of Rs.85 payable on the first of every succeeding English calendar month regularly to the landlady who is the revision petitioner herein. Since January, 1978, the rental has not been paid though it was claimed at the rate of Rs.150 a suit in O.S.No.405 of 1979 was filed by the revision petitioner herein before the civil court on 111. 1979 claiming arrears at the rate of Rs. 150 for a period of about 22 months. Even after the said suit, since the respondent had not paid the rent, R.C.O.P









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top