SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 946

GOVARDHAN
Kumara Pillai and Others – Appellant
Versus
Somasekaran Nair and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N. Thambi, for Petitioners. Miss.O.K.Sridevi, K.Sreekumaran Nair. for Respondents.

Judgment :

The fifth respondent in the civil miscellaneous appeal one Gopala Pillai died on 1. 1986 during the pendency of this civil miscellaneous appeal. The appellants have filed these petitions through the first appellant contending that the first respondent got the information of the death of Gopala Pillai only 17. 1993 from their Advocate at Madras on being informed by the advocate for the respondent and therefore, after making enquiry they are filing these petitions. The petition in C.M.P.No.11679 of 1993 is for excusing the delay of 2996 days in seeking to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the fifth respondent. C.M.P.No.11680 of 1993 is a petition to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the fifth respondent. C.M.P.No.11681 of 1993 is a petition to bring the respondents 93 to 98 as legal representatives of the deceased fifth respondent. C.M.P.No.11682 of 1993 is a petition for appointing the 95th respondent as the guardian of the minor respondents. In the common-affidavit of the first appellant, he has stated that one of the legal representatives of the deceased is already on record as the fourth respondent and there is no abatement of the appeal for ta





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top