Heard the learned counsel for petitioner. This civil revision petition is admitted. Mr.R.Subramanian appears for the respondent. Heard both the counsel at length. By consent of both, this civil revision petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. The above civil revision petition has been filed against the order of the Principal District Munsif, Pondicherry in E.A.No.70 of 1993 in E.P. No.44 of 1992 in H.R.C.O.P. No.90 of 1988. The petitioner is the landlord. The learned Principal District Munsif allowed E.A.No.70 of 1993 which was filed under Secs.47,94(e) and 151,C.P.C.,seeking to determine and adjudicate that the decree and the order under execution is a nullity and incapable of execution and consequently to dismiss the E.P. and far other reliefs. The petitions was presented on 17. 1993 before the said court. The respondent is a tenant. Before the learned District Munsif, the respondent herein challenged the decree under execution on the ground that it is one passed without jurisdiction and consequently is incapable of execution before the said court. The lower court, however, rejected the allegation of the respondent that she was not aware of the proceedings in the