This revision is against the order passed by the District Munsif, Maviladuthurai, dated 24. 1992 in E.P.No.294/1988 in O.S.No. 343 of 1982.

.2. The Execution Petition is for delivery of 88 cents in R.S.No.201/1 which is in R.S.No.201/1-A., The respondent has objected to the delivery of the property contending that the decree is an ex parte one which cannot be enforced and this particular extent of 88 cents is not in the four boundaries mentioned in the petition.

3. After considering the rival contentions of the parties, the learned District Munsif has rejected the objection raised by the respondent and directed delivery of the property through the Commissioner with a direction to find out whether the property described in the petition is in accordance with the decree to be delivered.

.4. It is against this order, the judgment-debtor has preferred this revision. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would argue that the order passed by the executing court is not legal and valid and therefore, it must be set aside in this revision. According to the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, the Executing Court has delegated its powers t