C.R.P.Nos.651 to 653 of 1994: These three revisions arise out of applications filed by the respondent in each of these revision petitions for injunction pending suits filed by them respectively. The prayer in each suit is for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner herein from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property except under the due process of law. The trial court granted injunction which has been confirmed by the appellate court. The aggrieved defendant in each suit has preferred these petitions.

2. Admittedly, the petitioner herein is the owner of the property. As it is a temple, the property is being leased out by public auction every year. In the auction held in 1988 the respondent in each of these revisions became the successful bidder and it was leased out for one year from 7. 1988 to 30.6.1989. In the auction held for the next two faslis, the respondents were again the successful bidders and the property was once again leased to them. In the auction held in 1991, the respondents did not take part. Some other party became the highest bidder. But, the respondents filed the present suits seeking