SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 77

RENGASAMY
Surya Narayanan and Another – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Vijayan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S. Jothiram, for Petitioners.

Judgment :

This revision is against the order of the learned XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate Saidapet, Madras, for the production of the records ordered under Sec. 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The respondent herein is the complainant for the offences under Secs. 461, 471, 474, Indian Penal Code read with Sec. 31 of Indian Penal Code. The first accused/first revision petitioner is employed as Personnel Manager in Hotel Chola Sheraton, Madras, whereas the second accused/second revision petitioner is the Senior Supervisor, Credit Department, in the same hotel. The respondent complainant was also working in the same hotel as Restaurant Cashier.

2. The private complaint of the respondent before the learned Magistrate is that the resignation letter dated nil was obtained from him under threat and coercion long back, by the management was pressed into service against him by these petitioners fabricating the same as a voluntary resignation letter given by the respondent herein to send him out. The respondent-complainant filed a petitioner under Sec. 91, Code of Criminal Procedure for production of certain documents by the persons mentioned in the list appended to the petition and th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top