ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Sri Chamundi Leather & two others – Appellant
Versus
The Collector, Kancheepuram. & four others – Respondent
Heard the counsel for the petitioners. The proceedings of the Tahsildar issued under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act 1905 is being challenged on the ground that the Notice as required under Section 7 of the said Act has not been issued to the petitioners. Issue of Section 7 notice is a condition precedent for the issue of Order under Section 6. When the matter came up for admission, I requested the learned Additional Government Pleader to get the records, since the question involved is too short and on perusal of the records the Writs can be disposed of.
2. Today the Government Pleader produced the records. From the records, there is nothing to show that a notice as required under Section 7 of the said Act has been served on the petitioners. Hence the condition precedent to issue the Order under Section 6 has not been complied with by the Authorities before ever the Order under Section 6 of the said Act is passed. Hence all the Writ Petitions are allowed and the proceedings of the Tahsildar issued under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act are quashed.
3. However, it is open to the respondents to issue a fresh notice as required under Section 7 of the Land Encr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.