SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 532

ARUNA JAGADEESAN
S. Rathinasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Judicial Magistrate, Erode – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. C. Deivasigamani, Advocate for Petitioner

Judgment :

The second respondent herein has filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner under the Negotiable Instruments Act. Since the cheque given by the petitioner was dishonoured, the case is pending before Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Erode, Periyar District in C.C.No. 23/95. The petitioner has filed C.M.P. 2105/95 seeking permission to examine two more witnesses and the Handwriting Expert. The trial Magistrate by his order dated 25. 95 has dismissed the petition on the ground that there is no bona fide on filing the petition and the intention of the petitioner is only to dela and protract the proceedings. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition to call for the records from the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Erode and to quash the order in C.M.P.No. 2105/95 dated 25. 95 in C.C.23/95.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had been deprived of his right to let in evidence and this would violate his fundamental right to have effective opportunity to prove his case. By rejecting the request of the petitioner to let in further evidence, his right of being beared is negatived and hence the writ petition is maintainable under Article 226 of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top