K.A.SWAMI, RAJU
M. Rukmani Devi – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Educational Officer & others – Respondent
.1. The above writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 4. 1995 in W.P.No.10311 of 1994, whereunder the writ petition filed by the appellant, seeking for a writ of mandamus to implement the orders of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.22945/A2/92 dated 24. 1994 and to reinstate the appellant as teacher in the 3rd respondent school with all backwages payable to the appellant during the period of suspension, come to be dismissed.
2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner was working as a School Assistant in the 3rd respondent School; that she is a daughter of the Correspondent of the 3rd respondent School and also the sister of the Head Master of the said school; that owing to certain personal and family disputes a suit for partition in O.S. No.103 of 1991 came to be filed on the file of the District Munsif, Tuticorin by the appellant and that the same was decreed in her favour. The defendant in that suit appears to have filed an appeal in A.S.No.62 of 1992 on the file of the Sub Court, Tutucorin and the same is said to be pending. According to the appellant, enraged at this and for no fault of the appellant by proceedings dated 112. 199
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.