SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 526

N.ARUMUGHAM
Duraisami and Another – Appellant
Versus
Rasayammal (died) and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K. Kumaraswamy, for Petitioners. V.K. Muthusamy, for Respondent Nos.8 and 9.

Judgment :

Respondents 3 and 4 who were judgment-debtors 3 and 4 in E.P. No.185 of 1979 in

O.S. No.817 of 1966 on the file of the learned District Munsif of Erode and the revision petitioners herein, challenging the order passed by the executing court on 20.1.1988 in the above matter, for its want of propriety and legality, under Sec.115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The respondents 1 and 2 herein had obtained a simple money decree in the above suit O.S. No.817 of 1966 against Kumaraswany Gounder and others, including the respondents/ defendants 3 and 4, who are the revision petitioners herein on 29. 1966. Subsequently, since the original parties to the suit, the decree holder dried, their legal representatives as shown in the execution petition were added and brought on record. An execution petition E.P.R. No.948 of 1967 was filed against the judgment-debtors, including the revision petitioners herein and whereupon, a sum of Rs.721.85 was recovered as part satisfaction, however, with the recording of the part satisfaction, the said execution petition was closed. Another execution petition E.P.R. No.201 of 1967 was filed for attachment of the petition mentioned properties which













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top