Srinivasan, J.

1. It is very unfortunate that the learned District Judge has not even chosen to go through either the pleadings or the evidence on record; but granted divorce just because the respondent remained ex-parte.

2. Even in the petition filed by the husband, there is no averment that the wife is guilty of adultery. Relevant averments are in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the petition, which read as follows:-

“But this plaintiff/petitioner came to know that the respondent/defendant have indulged into immoral conducts with other men illegally except the plaintiff/petitioner in his absence. This Offence of adultry of the defendant/respondent was seen by the plaintiff/petitioner on two instances and warned her severely. Subsequently, on one occasion, this plaintiff/petitioner came across few immoral and ugly letters written by few persons to the defendant/respondent which were kept secretly under her custody so as to affirm the illegal conducts of the respondent/defendant.”

It is seen that very vague averments have been made, which do not go to the extent of stating that the wife is guilty of adultery. The husband has given evidence as P.W.1. There is no whisper in his de