SRINIVASAN, S.S.SUBRAMANI
Shoba Viswanathan – Appellant
Versus
D. P. Kingsley – Respondent
Srinivasan, J.
This petition for condonation of delay of 135 days in filing the appeal is posted before us on our direction given yesterday when C.M.P.No. 12907 of 1995 for fixing a date for hearing the O.S. Appeal was posted before us. We were informed that this petition was pending. We find now that in the petition for condonation of delay, while ordering notice, the Division Bench directed that petition to be posted along with the appeal for hearing. Thus, the registry numbered the appeal. When the petition was posted again after some time, the Bench passed the following order:-
“Wrongly posted. Post long with the appeal.”
2. Obviously, the Bench was under the impression that a petition to condone the delay could be disposed of long with the main appeal. In our opinion, the said view is erroneous. It is settled law that unless the delay in filing the appeal is condoned, the same cannot be taken on file. Section 3 of the Limitation Act provides that every suit instituted, appeal preferred and application made after the prescribed period shall be dismissed, although limitation has not been set up as a defence. The language of the Section is mandatory. Hence, the Cour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.