SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 959

THANIKKACHALAM
M. V. Govindan – Appellant
Versus
Venkatarama Chetty and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Rangarathinam, for Petitioner. V.K.Muthuswamy, for Respondents.

Judgment :

This revision is directed against the order passed in R.E.A. No.23 of 1983 in R.E.P. No.268 of 1970 in O.S. No.594 of 1966 on the file of the District Munsif’s Court, Dharmapuri.

2. First respondent is the decree-holder and respondents 2 and 3 are the judgment-debtors. R.E.A. No.23 of 1983 was filed for delivery of the property, which the petitioner herein purchased in court auction held on 13. 1971 for a sum of Rs.4,005. The sale was confirmed on 6. 1971 and the sale certificate issued on 26. 1971. R.E.A. No.458 of 1972 was filed for delivery of possession on 3. 1972. On 3. 1972 an order was passed to deliver by 14. 1972. Since there was obstruction, steps were directed to be taken for removal of obstruction. Since steps were not taken, R.E.A. No.458 of 1972 was dismissed on 14. 1972. R.E.A. No. 134 of 1973 was filed on 211. 1972 and an order for directing delivery by 3. 1973 after removing obstruction was passed, on 211. 1973. On 3. 1973 R.E.A. No.388 of 1973 was filed for removal of obstruction. On 212. 1973 an order was passed directing delivery with police protection by 11. 1974. O.S. No.411 of 1974 was filed on 11. 1974 to set aside the order passed in the execution



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top