SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 944

ARUNACHALAM
M. SELVARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:R. Raghupathi, V. Murali, Advocates.

Judgment :

ARUNACHALAM, J.

( 1 ) IN Special Case No. 1 of 1984, on the file of the Special Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Thanjavur, appellant Selvarajan was convicted under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. He was further convicted under Section 5 (1) (d) read with Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced. to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years as well pay Rs. 500/- as fine, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three more months. The substantive sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) AT the relevant time, which dates back to August, 1983, appellant was working as an Assistant in the Excise Office situate at Mayilduthurai. P. W. 1. Gunasekaran successfully bid in the auction held for conduct of toddy shop for the period 1982-83. The auction related to Sethi Village, where P. W. 1 was then residing. Before the auction was conducted, P. W. 1 paid a security deposit of Rs. 1000/- as well as another Rs. 1000/- for solvency. These payments were made at Taluk Office, Mayiladutharia. There is no dispute that he conducted trade in toddy till 15-7-




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top