The tenant Messrs.Brooke Bond India Limited who lost before both the authorities below, is the revision petitioner.

2. Respondent herein filed the eviction petition for eviction on the ground that the building is required by him for bona fide own use. It is averred in paragraph 3 of the eviction petition that he is the owner of the building. Even though the petitioner (in the eviction petition) owns other buildings, all of them are tenanted. He is running a partnership business along with his other family members Besides that, he is also having money-lending business. For the purpose of the partnership business and also for the money-lending business, he wants the scheduled building. It is said that the petitioner is not having in his possession any other building which is suitable for the said purpose. It is further averred that various demands were made to the tenant, petitioner herein, and they promised to vacate the demised premises provided some time was given. On that assurance, one year time was given. Of course, at that time, they volunteered to pay an increased rent. But even after the expiry of the time granted, the tenant did not vacate. It is further averred