SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 12

N.ARUMUGHAM
K. R. NAGAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appearing Parties:A.N. Rajan, Advocate.

Judgment :

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the learned Special District and Sessions Judge, Madurai in c. C. No. 409 of 1995, dated 20-9-1995 against the appellant/accused for the offence under Section 8 (c) read with 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances Act.

( 2 ) FOR better appreciation of the case on hand, the case of the prosecution needs narration, which is as follows: At or about 20. 15 hours on 30-12-1994, near the bus stop situated on the western side of Madurai Pudhunathan Road, opposite to Ilaiyarani and Maharani theatrs, the appellant/accused herein, was found in possession of 55 ampoules of TIDIGESIC, injection medicine, each ampoule containing 2 ml. with the contents of BUPRENORPHINE, a narcotic and psychotropic substance specified by the relevant Rule and the Act above referred. The value of the same would be about Rs. 550. When the appellant/ accused was intercepted by the respondent police at the above place and time, he was found with the above contraband without any licence or valid permit, kept in a brown colour bag marked under M. O. I, which consisted of the green colour box with all the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top