ABDUL HADI
R. Thyagarajan – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Ammal – Respondent
.1. The defendant in O.S.No.5614 of 1987 has filed this civil revision petition against the order dated 110. 1995 in I.A.No.11190 of 95. The said LA. filed by the respondent/plaintiff sought permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. The said prayer has been granted by the impugned order on condition the plaintiff pays a sum of Rs.200 on or before 210. 1995. Aggrieved by the said order, the defendant
.has preferred this civil revision petition.
.2. The material allegation in the affidavit in support of the LA. is as follows:-
.“Since the plaint needs lot of amendment by incorporating a new Schedule regarding the encroached portion of the defendant and also the amendment of the Schedule to the plaint by mentioning the backyard portion alone, the plaint has to be amended suitably. To Avoid more corrections and also amendment, I am advised to file a new suit for the same cause of action.1
3. As already stated, the suit was filed as early as 1987 and it is not even stated in the supporting affidavit when actually the plaintiff realized that the plaint needed such amendments. Actually speaking, as already pointed by the learned counsel for the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.