SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 469

P.SATHASIVAM, A.ABDUL HADI
Chandrika – Appellant
Versus
M. Vijayakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.A.Venkatesan Advocate for Appellant Mr.Sampathkumar Advocate for Respondent

Judgment :

P. Sathasivam, J.

.1. The respondent in Family Court O.P.No.199 of 1992 on the file of Principal Family Court, Madras, is the appellant in the above appeal. The husband/respondent herein filed F.C.O.No.199 of 1992 before the said court under section 13(l)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as amended against the appellant/wife for the grant of divorce on the ground that the wife deserted him without any just cause or reason. The Family Court, by order dated 3. 1995, allowed the original petition and dissolved the marriage between the appellant and the respondent solemnized on 3. 1983 by a decree of divorce. Aggrieved by the decree of the Family Court dated 3. 95, the wife has now come forward with the present appeal before this Court under Section 19 of the Family Court Act.

.2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the petition for divorce are as follows:-According to the respondent/petitioner, the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent herein was solemnized on 3. 1983 at Madras according to Hindu rites and customs. They lived happily for a short period. It is contended that the wife often used to leave for her parents house on some pretext or the other




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top