SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 448

P.SATHASIVAM
P. Rukmani – Appellant
Versus
R. Narayani & Others – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Balasubramanian for Appellant. K.Srinivasan for Respondents.

Judgment :

Plaintiff in O.S.No.1689 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif, Coimbatore, is the appellant in the above second appeal. He filed the suit for delivery of possession of the suit properties, arrears of rent and for future damages.

2. The averments in the plaint are as follows: The suit properties originally belonged to one R.Janardhanan as per the registered partition deed dated 312. 1951. The said Janardhanan sold the suit property to the plaintiff under the sale deed dated 11. 1978 for valuable consideration. The plaintiff thus became the owner of the suit property and she is paying house tax therefor. The previous owner Janardhanan allowed the Uppilipalayam Panchayat to run a school in the suit properties and the panchayat was running a school for some time. After 10 years, the panchayat vacated the school. One Raghava Mannadiar was employed as a watchman-cum-peon in the school run by the panchayat. The said Raghava Mannadiar died about 7 or 8 years ago. When the school vacated the premises, the said Raghava Mannadiar was permitted by Janardhanan to occupy the eastern room of the school premises on a nominal rent. After the death of the said Raghava Mannadiar, defe
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top