The revision petitioners are the legal representatives of the deceased landlord B.Ramaswami Chettiar, who is the owner of the property in question. The 1st respondent is the tenant represented by its partner K.S. Muthu Mudaliar. Respondents 2 and 3 were brought on record when the appeal was pending before the Appellate Authority.

2. The landlord filed a petition for eviction against the 1st respondent/ tenant under Secs.l0(2)(l) and 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. The eviction was sought on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and also for additional accommodation for the business needs of the landlord’s wife and son. The 1st respondent is a tenant in respect of Door No.l9-B, D.P.C. Lane, Bazaar Street, Salem Town. Both the authorities below have rejected the petition filed by the landlord. Aggrieved against the same, the present revision has been filed.

3. In this Court, the petitioners have confined their claim only with regard to additional accommodation. The learned counsel for the petitioners has not advanced any argument on the finding of the authorities below with regard to Sec.10(2)(1) of the Act.

4. It is the