SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 802

S.S.SUBRAMANI, SRINIVASAN
M. Vaidurayamma – Appellant
Versus
P. Suryanarayana and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
G.V.S.Iyer, for Appellant. Prakash Goklaney, Respondent No. 1.

Judgment :-

S.S. Subramani, J.

The unsuccessful plaintiff in C.S.No.216 of 1986, on the file of this Court, is the appellant before us.

2. The suit was instituted in forma pauperis, and on dismissal of the suit, this appeal was filed by the appellant as an indigent person.

.3. The material averments that are stated in the plaint are, that the plaint schedule property bearing Door No.22 (Old No.29), Pycrofts Road, Triplicane, Madras, originally belonged to one Sakala Subbarayalu Chetty, having purchased the same with his own funds, and he gave the same as ‘Stridhana’ to his daughter Seshamma. It is further said that at the time when the property was given as ‘Stridhana’, Seshamma was already married to Jila Venkata Krishnamma Chetty son of Jilla Narasimhalu Chetty. Seshamma died without issues in 1903, and thereafter her husband married Kamalamma alias Kanakamma as his second wife. It is further stated that after the death of the first wife, Kamalamma alias Kanakamma took the property as ‘Stridhana’ property from the first wife, claiming herself as sister of Seshmma. It is said that the second wife was collecting rent in respect of the plaint schedule property. She also died issuel














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top