SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 1028

GOVARDHAN
New India Assurance Company Limited, Salem – Appellant
Versus
Shyamala and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
K.Padmanabhan, for Appellant. V.K.Nachimuthu and J.R.K. Bhavanandam, for Respondents.

Judgment :

This appeal is against the order passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem in M.C.O.P.No.163 of 1983.

2. The petitioner in their petition contend as follows: The first petitioner is the wife and the petitioners 2 to 9 are the children of the deceased Seethapathy who was employed in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Mettur Electricity System as a Foreman on a salary of Rs. 1,103.20 per month. On 11. 1982 at about 9.30 a.m., Seethapathy was proceeding from Athur to Kattukottai on his cycle in the Salem-Cuddalore Main Road, Taxi bearing registration No. M.D.G. 1990 and driven in a rash and negligent manner dashed against him from behind as a result of which, he sustained injuries and succumbed to the injuries on the spot. The respondents 1 and 2 are the owner and the insurer of the taxi. Deceased was aged 52 years at the time of his death. The petitioners make a claim for Rs. 1 lakh.

3. The second respondent in his counter contends as follows: The car M.D.G. 1990 has not been insured with the second respondent on the date of the accident. There is no privity of contract between them and the first respondent. The age and earning of the deceased are not admitted. Comp









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top