1. Nadippisai Pulavar K.R.Ramaswamy Sugar Mill is the revision petitioner in both the revisions. Revision petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are against the order made in A.P.Nos.217 of 1991 and 218 of 1991, dated 13. 1992 on the file of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madras.

2. The case of the petitioner is briefly naratted hereunder:-The 1st respondent in both the revisions in order to raise sugarcane crop in their respective field, applied to become a shareholder of the petitioner sugar mill through the 2nd respondent herein, which is a primary agricultural co-operative bank. It is their further case that both of them were agriculturists and after becoming a member of the 2nd respondent co-operative bank requested the said bank to advance loan to become a shareholder of the petitioner sugarmill. It is further averred that as per the request made by the 1st respondent herein, in each case, the 2nd respondent has sanctioned loan and forwarded the same to the petitioner sugar mill. According to the 1st respondent, even after several months, the petitioner sugar mill has not enrolled them as member of the sugar factory, due to w