RAJU
Poongavanam – Appellant
Versus
Perumal Pillai and Another – Respondent
The above second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No.313 of 1977 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Kallakurichi, against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Vridhachalam, dated 28. 1982 in A.S. No. 153 of 1991, reversing the judgment and decree of learned trial Judge dated 21. 1981 in O.S. No.313 of 1977.
2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration of her title to the suit properties, for a directions the 2nd defendant to deliver possession of the suit properties to the plaintiff and for mesne profits.
3. The case of the plaintiff before the trial court was that the properties belonged to the 1st defendant. Pappathi Ammal, who was in possession and enjoyment of the same that the plaintiff is the daughter of the maternal uncle of the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant is the son of the maternal uncle of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant was stated to have had no issues. The 2nd defendant was said to have obtained a deed dated 3. 1972 from the 1st defendant fraudulently and that he has also agreed to pay 3 bags of paddy and Rs.50 per annum, till the death of the 1st defendant, and inspite of the same, the 2nd defen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.