N.ARUMUGHAM
T. T. V. DHINAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, SHASTRI BHAVAN, MADRAS – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Revision challenging the propriety and legality of the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E. O. II), Egmore, madras passed in M. P. No. 347/96 in E. O. C. C. No. 27/96 dated 9-8-1996 was sought to be admitted and on ordering notice of motion, the Enforcement directorate entered appearance through the Bar and opposed the very admission of this revision.
( 2 ) A written complaint against one T. T. V. Dinakaran was filed by the enforcement Officer of the Enforcement Directorate, Madras before the trial court for the offences under Sections 8 (1), 9 (1) (a) and 14 of the Foreign exchange and Regulation Act (herein after referred to as "fera" ). This complaint was filed as early as March 1996. Various allegations amounting to the facts constituting the violations of the provisions of the FERA were alleged with details and before that it appears that the reply was sought for as evidenced from certain bank deposits in Barclays Bank, England and about 13 instruments said to have been forwarded by the accused to the credit of Dipper Investments. The documents pertaining to the said transaction have also been mentioned in the complaint.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.