S.M.ABDUL WAHAB
Mahaveer Electric Corporation – Appellant
Versus
D. Ashok Kumar and others – Respondent
1. These revisions arise out of a common order passed in M.P.Nos.683 of 1993 and 738 of 1993 in E.P. No. 368 of 1993 in R.C.O.P. No. 40 of 1993 dated 12. 1993.
2. M.P. No. 683 of 1993 is for setting aside the exparte order dated 9. 1993 in E.P. No. 368 of 1993 and M.P. No. 738 of 1993 is for a direction to the bailiff to effect redelivery of the demised property "as is where condition" to the petitioner. Learned XIII Judge, Small Cause Court by his order dated 12. 1993 rejected the M.P. No. 738 of 1983 and consequently on the same date rejected M.P. No. 368 of 1993 also. The above two petitions were filed by aggrieved tenant.
3. The short facts for understanding the scope of the revisions are as follows:
R.C.O.P. No. 40 of 1993 was filed by the landlord for eviction of the petitioner from a godown bearing door No. 7, Thambu Naick Street, Madras-79. The said godown forms part of a big building. Notices were sent to the said addresses. As the petitioner herein did not appear, an exparte eviction order was passed. Subsequently in E.P. No. 368 of 1993 the landlord has taken possession of the said godown. The delivery order in E.P. No. 368 of 1993 was also an exparte orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.