K.A.SWAMI, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
The Special Tahsildar (L. A. ), MEPZ, Saidapet Taluk, Madras – Appellant
Versus
K. Jayaraman and Others – Respondent
K.A.Swami, CJ.
The writ appeals are preferred against the orders dated 24. 1994 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petitions 3698, 6175, 6180 and 6181 of 1993, 3967, 3969, 6173 and 6174 of 1993, 6601, 6600, 6590, 8160 and 6587 of 1993, 6602, 9152, 7032 of 1993 and 1791 of 1994, 9153, 6588, 6589 and 6182 of 1993, issuing writs in the nature of mandamus to the Collector to determine the compensation payable to the respective writ petitioners, in accordance with Sec.28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of the order either by the Government Pleader or the petitioners. Hence, the State Government has come up in appeals.
2. The writ petitioners have filed applications under Sec.28-A of the Land Acquisition Act for re-determining the compensation by the Collector of the District on the ground that in respect of the lands acquired under the very same Notification, there is enhancement compensation made in the reference made to the Civil Court. The Collector has not yet taken up the applications for consideration on the ground that the appeals have been preferred against the awards passed by the Civil Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.