SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 3

ARUNACHALAM, PRATAP SINGH
RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:K.N. Basha, N.T. Vanamamalal, Shanmugha Velayudhan, V. Gopinath, Advocates.

Judgment :

PRATAP SINGH, J.

( 1 ) ACCUSED 2 and 3 in Sessions Case No. 107195 on the file of Sessions Judge, South Arcot District, Cuddalore, are the appellants. The appellants and Natesan and Pichaikara Gounder, who were arrayed as accused 1 and 4 respectively faced trial before the learned trial Judge. The charges were that (i) on 23/11/1984, at about 6.00 P. M. at Nathamedu village, in the garden of Jayaram, accused No. 3 with intention to cause the death of Andal, beat her with iron crow-bar on her head on the left and right sides and caused her death and hence liable to be punished under section 302, Indian Penal Code. (ii) At the same time, place, accused No. 2, with intention to cause the death of Jayaraman, beat him on his left hand and stabbed him on his forehead with crow-bar and attempted to commit his murder and hence he is liable to be punished, under section 307, Indian Penal Code. (iii) At the same time and place accused No. 2 voluntarily caused simple hurt on the left palm of Lakshathipathi with crow-bar and hence liable to be punished under section 324, Indian Penal Code. (iv) At the same time and place, accused No. 1 beat Jayaraman with a firewood stick on his back


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top