SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 337

JANARTHANAM
Balasundaram – Appellant
Versus
Santhi – Respondent


Advocates:
R.M.Krishna Raju, for Petitioner.

Judgment :-

Balasundaram and Santhi are spouses their marriage having been solemnized on 17. 1985 according to Hindu Custom at Periyari Village, Athur Taluk. The spouses were unable to derive, even at the inception, the matrimonial blise and happiness, as a consequence of the development of incompatibility of temperment due to their having been brought up in different strata of atmosphere. Want of cordial atmosphere, it is alleged, came to prevail also by reason of demand of dowry. The wife, under the facade of the alleged demand of dowry, was stated to have unjustly deserted the husband and took shelter in her parents’ house, which was stated to have given rise to a cause for the husband to resort to initiation of proceedings praying for restitution of conjugal rights, which was numbered as H.M.O.P.No.24 of 1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Salem.

2. The wife, of course, resisted the claim of the husband for restitution of conjugal rights, by entering appearance therefor. She also appeared to have instituted proceedings claiming maintenance under Sec.125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’), which was taken on file as M.C.No.4 of 1991 on the file





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top