SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 288

BELLIE, THANIKKACHALAM
R. Anandavalli – Appellant
Versus
Alagammal and others – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S.Ahmed, for Appellant. M.Velusamy for Respondent Nos.1 to 6. V.Kunchuhapatham, for Respondent No.9.

Judgment :-

Bellie, J.

The appellant-plaintiff R.Anandavalli is one of the daughters of Raju Konar, the first defendant being his wife, defendants 2 to 6 sons and defendants 7 and 8 daughters.

2. The case of the plaintiffs is that her father Raju Konar has himself earned money and acquired the properties and the bank deposits described in the suit schedule from his meat shop. Raju Konar died intestate on 13. 1971. Each of the plaintiff and defendants 1 to 8 are entitled to equal share in the properties. While so the defendants producing a false release deed alleged to have been executed by the plaintiff withdrew the deposit amount from the bank on 112. 1974. The plaintiff has claimed 1/9 share in the suit properties.

3. Defendants 1 to 6 defended the case by filing written statement. They denied that the suit properties are the self-acquired properties of Raju Konar and the plaintiff is entitled to 1/9 share. They contended that the plaintiff received a sum of Rs.8,000 in cash and executed a release deed dated 112. 1974 relinquishing her right in the suit properties. It is further contended that she is not entitled to any share in the amount deposited in the bank. Raju Konar inher


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top