SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Mad) 436

SWAMIDURAI
A. Radhakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Auvadai Ammal and another – Respondent


Advocates:
T.V.Ramanujam, for Petitioner. D.Nellaiappan, for Respondents.

Judgment :

The civil revision petition is taken up today for final disposal by consent of parties. This revision is fried against the order made in an application for amendment of plaint in IA.No.19921 of 1991 in O.S.No.9306 of 1989 on the file of the learned XVII Assistant City Civil Judge, Madras, dismissing the application filed under O.6. Rule 17 and Sec.151, C.P.C. The original plaint is for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, servants and men or every one claiming under them or acting on their behalf from in any way interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit properties, more fully described in the Schedules A,B and C in the plaint and for costs. In this application for amendment the plaintiff seeks to introduce certain facts which are detailed by him in his application and the plaintiff also seeks to introduce two new prayers (i) for a declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit property more fully described in the schedule A, B and C, and (ii) for a direction to the defendants to deliver vacant possession of the plaint, A, B and C Schedule properties to the plaintiff within the time to be fi




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top