SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 71

K.MOHAN RAM
Clara & Another – Appellant
Versus
T. Harendranath & Another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants:V. Raghavachari, Advocate. For the Respondents:R2, S. Manohar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The claimants have preferred the above appeal being aggrieved by the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional Sub-Judge), Chengalpattu in M.C.O.P.No.180 of 1996.

2. The first appellant-wife and the second appellant-minor daughter of the deceased-Abharam Mathew filed M.C.O.P.No.180 of 1996 claiming a sum of Rs.30,00,000/-by way of compensation on the basis that while the deceased was travelling as a pillion rider in the scooter bearing Registration No.TN09-E-1382 belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent and driven by one Pushparaj on his way to Guduvanchery to Maraimalainagar. The driver of the scooter drove it rashly and negligently at a high speed and dashed on a blind end and was thrown off resulting in multiple injuries and instant death. According to the claimants, the deceased was aged 30 years on the date of death and the appellants were aged 27 years and 2 years respectively. The deceased was a qualified Automobile Engineer, who had undergone training in Germany in the manufacturing of footwear and was employed as a Maintenance Executive with Wipro Limited on a monthly salary of Rs.7,500/-.

3. The first resp

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top