SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 144

R.BANUMATHI
G. Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Devarajan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:D. Murthi, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Vediyappan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 12.04.2006 passed by the Additional District Munsif, Kanchipuram in I.A.No.71 of 2006 in O.S.No.204 of 1998, condoning the delay of 563 days in filing the Petition to set aside the exparte decree on payment of costs of Rs.750/-. The Plaintiff is the Revision Petitioner.

2. Brief facts are as follows:- Revision Petitioner/Plaintiff has filed the Suit against the Respondent/Defendant in O.S.No.204 of 1998 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram for recovery of a sum of Rs.68,800/-. Suit summons served to the Defendant and suit was posted for appearance of the Defendant on 20.11.1998. On 20.11.1998, the Defendant was set exparte. The Respondent/Defendant had filed I.A.No.858 of 1998 under O.9 R.7 C.P.C to set aside the exparte order and the same was allowed on 211. 1998. The Suit was posted for filing of the Written Statement on various dates from 211. 1998 to 30.06.2003. Since the Defendant has not filed the Written Statement for nearly four years, on 30.06.2003, exparte decree was passed.

3. The Plaintiff/Decree Holder filed E.P.No.41 of 2004 for recovery of the amount by arrest of the Defenda


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top