SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 625

R.BANUMATHI
Halimunnisa – Appellant
Versus
Pervise Ahamed & Another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:K.M. Aasim Shehzad, Advocate. For the Respondents: No appearance.

Judgment :-

Aggrieved by the order of Eviction passed on the ground of Wilful Default, the Tenant has preferred this Civil Revision Petition. For convenience, the parties are referred to in their original rank in R.C.O.P.No.19 of 1992.

2. 1. The demised premises – Shop bearing Door No.54, Main Bazaar, Vellore originally owned by Sherfunnisa Begum – the Petitioners Grandmother. The premises was taken on lease by the Husband of the Respondent / Tenant originally for rent of Rs.350/- p.m. and the rent was later raised to Rs.600/- p.m.

2. 2. Case of Petitioner is that Sherfunnisa Begum – Grandmother of Petitioner died leaving behind her Husband and Son – Father of the Petitioner, who are the sole heirs, who inherited the property. The Respondent / Tenant attorned tenancy to the Petitioners Father and was paying the rent to him only for two months. The Petitioners Grandfather and Father had executed a Gift Deed to the Petitioner in respect of the demised property under Settlement Deed dated 30.05.1990. The Respondent has paid the rent to the Petitioner for two months - August and September 1990. The Petitioner has filed R.C.O.P.No.8 of 1991 for eviction on the ground that the Petitione


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top