Common Order:

Aggrieved by the order of the learned Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu in allowing the Interlocutory Applications filed by the defendants 1,2 and 4, under Order 8, Rule 9 CPC seeking permission to receive additional written statement, these CRPs have been filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff.

.2. For convenience, the pleadings in I.A.No:1805 of 2005 will be taken up and the parties will be referred to as arrayed in the said application. The suit has been filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff as against the respondents herein for partition of the suit properties and to allot 1/6th share to her. The defendants filed written statements. Pending the suit, the first defendant filed the impugned Interlocutory Application to receive additional written statement. In the said application, the first defendant contended that the plaintiff has changed her attitude after filing of her original written statement and as there is no hope or sign of her reforming herself, she had decided to file the additional written statement to correctly set out her legal rights against the plaintiff. According to the first defendant, the property at halls Road, Egmo