SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 1082

A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN
K. Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
K. Uma & Others – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:T.R. Ravi, Advocate. For the Respondents:R1 to 4, K. Sugumaran, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Revision has been preferred against the order passed in M.C.No.389/2004 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

2. The petitioners/respondents herein who are admittedly wife and children of the respondent/revision petitioner herein respectively. The 1st petitioner is the wife and the petitioners 2 to 4 are the children. They have preferred a petition under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., for maintainance. The first petitioner asked for Rs.2000/- per month and for other minors petitioners 2 to 4, she has asked for Rs.1,500/- each per month. In the petition the first petitioner would say that the marriage between her (1s petitioner) and the respondent/revision petitioner herein was conducted on 7. 1985 at Sri Muthallaman Kovil, Thiruppauliyur, Cuddalore, as per the Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage she gave birth to one daughter and two sons who are now aged 16, 14 and 12 respectively. According to the 1s petitioner, the respondent/revision petitioner herein is a drunkard and after consuming liquor he use to bet her and he failed to maintain the family. She would further allege that the respondent/revision petitioner herein had gon





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top