This Civil Revision Petition is aggrieved over the admission of the RCOP.No.1015 of 2005 made by the learned Rent Controller by accepting the power of attorney document signed by the respondents.

.2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

.The respondents have filed RCOP.No.1015 of 2005 along with a batch of RCOP.Nos:1014, 1013, 1016,1017,1018,1019 and 1020 of 2005 on the file of the XI Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai through their power of attorney Mrs. Munaga Sukumari against the petitioner herein. The respondents have also filed M.P.Nos.592, 593, 594, 595, 596, 597, 598, 599 of 2005 under Section 11(4) of the Tamil Nadu Building Lease and Rent Control Act to pay the arrears of rent. The said petitions were dismissed.

3. Aggrieved over the said orders, the respondents have preferred appeals in R.C.A.Nos.173, 172, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179 of 2006 respectively. They have also filed petitions in M.P.Nos.52, 51, 58, 55, 56, 57, 53, 54 of 2006 to permit the 10th respondent herein viz., Mrs. Munaga Sukumari to file and prosecute the appeals as Power of Attorney of the respondents 1 to 9. Now the revision petitioners want to challenge the power of attorney executed