This Criminal Revision has been preferred against the order, dated 26.04.2004 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2004 in S.C.No.292 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge / FTC No.III, Coimbatore.

2. It is seen that the petitioner herein Tmt.Pathirammal filed a private complaint against the respondents 1 to 3 / accused before the fourth respondent under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for the alleged offence under Section 306 r/w 511 IPC and under Sections 4 and 9 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Ordinance, 2003 and Sections 4 and 9 of the said ordinance r/w Section 511 IPC.

.3. The petitioner and her husband Thimmayan had borrowed amount from the respondents 1 to 3. The husband of the petitioner herein had borrowed loan from them on 03.04.2000. According to her, she had entrusted certain documents relating to the property to the respondents 1 to 3 towards security for the amount borrowed. She had also entered into an agreement for the sale of property with the second respondent for a consideration of Rs.2,00,000/- and received an advance of Rs.1,50,000/- and also executed power of attorney authorizing 3rd respondent to sell